Robin Morse

Robin Morse

Robin Morse is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Business Litigation and Labor, Employment and Benefits practice groups. She represents clients in complex civil litigation, including contract disputes, business torts, and employment matters. In particular, Robin’s practice includes a concentration in prosecuting and defending against breaches of non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality agreements. Read more.

Subscribe to all posts by Robin Morse

Here We Go Again: Massachusetts Non-Compete Legislation Back in Play

As we previously reported, the Massachusetts House and Senate passed contrasting versions of non-compete reform bills in 2016 but were unable to come to an agreement by the end of the legislative session. Efforts began anew last month as Senator William Brownsberger and Representative Lori Ehrlich filed a new non-compete bill on January 20: An … Continue Reading

Mid-Year Review: New Non-Compete Legislation in 2016

In the first half of 2016, we have already seen significant changes to a number of state non-compete laws. In this post, we provide a compilation of recently enacted legislation in Alabama, Connecticut, Idaho, Oregon, and Utah, as well as several important developments at the federal level. Against this nationwide backdrop, there is non-compete legislation … Continue Reading

Illinois Attorney General Sues Jimmy John’s Over Non-Competes

Last week, the Illinois Attorney General filed suit against Jimmy John’s, alleging that the company’s non-competes violate state law. These non-competes prohibit all employees, including sandwich makers, from working during their employment and for two years afterward at businesses within several miles of any Jimmy John’s nationwide that earn more than 10% of their revenue from … Continue Reading

White House Weighs in on Ongoing Non-Compete Battle

As states continue to struggle with the pros and cons of non-competes, the White House has recently weighed in, siding largely with critics of non-competes.  In Non-Compete Agreements: Analysis of the Usage, Potential Issues, and State Responses, the Obama Administration draws on a recent report from the U.S. Treasury Office of Economic Policy to provide … Continue Reading

Utah and Idaho Take Contrasting Approaches to Non-Compete Reform

In the last few weeks, Utah and Idaho have each passed bills changing the landscape of non-compete enforceability in strikingly different ways. Utah’s law places further limitations on the use of non-competes. In contrast, the Idaho bill (expected to be signed by the governor shortly) permits greater enforceability of non-competes. Utah Imposes New Restrictions on … Continue Reading

The House Speaker Proposes New Non-Compete Legislation in Massachusetts

This morning, House Speaker Robert DeLeo announced at a Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce breakfast that the House will be releasing a bill this session that imposes some limitations on non-competes. Although the language of the proposed bill is not yet available, Speaker DeLeo described two key elements: Time Limit: The proposed bill would limit … Continue Reading

Massachusetts Federal Court Reaffirms That Continued Employment Constitutes Sufficient Consideration for Non-Compete

In American Well Corporation v. Obourn, Civil No. 15-12265-LTS, 2015 WL 7737328 (D. Mass. Dec. 1, 2015), Judge Sorokin of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts upheld a non-compete entered into seven months after the employee’s start date. The Court explained that as to whether continued employment constitutes sufficient consideration for a … Continue Reading

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Continued Employment as Sufficient Consideration for Non-Compete

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently held in Socko v. Mid-Atlantic Systems of CPA, Inc. that a non-compete is enforceable only if a current employee receives new consideration beyond continued employment. The Court held that this is the case even if a non-compete provides that the parties “intend to be legally bound,” which typically obviates the need … Continue Reading

They’re Not Dead Yet: Massachusetts Courts Continue to Enforce Non-Competes and Enjoin Defendants in the Right Circumstances

In Pegasystems Inc. v. Appian Corp., Judge Mitchell Kaplan of the Massachusetts Business Litigation Session enjoined a sales employee from working for a competitor for three months. This recent opinion highlights some common issues in Massachusetts non-compete law and illustrates judges’ broad discretion to fashion relief.… Continue Reading

Be Careful What You Wish For: Employer’s Arbitration Clause Backfires

A recent decision from the Business Litigation Session of the Massachusetts Superior Court has broad implications for non-compete cases involving arbitration clauses. In TIBCO Software, Inc. v. Zephyr Health, Inc. and Kevin Willoe, the court denied an employer’s motion for a temporary restraining order enforcing a non-compete, finding the employer’s own arbitration provision required it … Continue Reading

State-Specific Quirks May Thwart Unwary Employers

Massachusetts employers and employees have enough to contend with trying to keep abreast of the judicial and legislative fits and starts of non-compete reform within the state, let alone developments in other states. It is important to remember that non-compete law varies widely from state to state, and these variations may come into play if … Continue Reading
LexBlog